docs(plan): add Phase 2.5 context budget reliability (#44)
#5 smoke test showed the dir loop exhausts the 126k context budget on a 13-file Python lib. Sequencing #44 between Phase 2 and Phase 3 so the foundation is solid before planning + external tools add more prompt and tool weight.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ffd9d9e929
commit
e942ecc34a
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
9
PLAN.md
9
PLAN.md
|
|
@ -541,6 +541,15 @@ without 9 phases of rework.
|
||||||
Until then, the survey prompt carries a Band-Aid warning that the
|
Until then, the survey prompt carries a Band-Aid warning that the
|
||||||
histogram is biased toward source code.
|
histogram is biased toward source code.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Phase 2.5 — Context budget reliability (#44)
|
||||||
|
- Dir loop exhausts the 126k context budget on a 13-file Python lib
|
||||||
|
(observed during #5 smoke test). Must be addressed before Phase 3
|
||||||
|
adds longer prompts and more tools, or every later phase will
|
||||||
|
inherit a broken foundation.
|
||||||
|
- Investigate root cause (tool result accumulation, parse_structure
|
||||||
|
output size, redundant reads) before picking a fix.
|
||||||
|
- Add token-usage instrumentation so regressions are visible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Phase 3 — Investigation planning
|
### Phase 3 — Investigation planning
|
||||||
- Planning pass after survey, before dir loops
|
- Planning pass after survey, before dir loops
|
||||||
- `submit_plan` tool
|
- `submit_plan` tool
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue